# Sprinto vs Vanta: A Scored Comparison **URL:** https://theauditrail.com/compare/sprinto-vs-vanta/ **Published:** 2026-10-18 **Modified:** 2026-10-18 **Author:** The Audit Trail editorial desk > Sprinto 84 and Vanta 82 on rubric v0.9, a 2-point gap. The two tie on seven criteria and split on customisation. --- Comparison # Sprinto vs Vanta: A Scored Comparison Sprinto scores 84 and Vanta 82 on rubric v0.9, a 2-point gap. The two tie on seven of the eight criteria and split on customisation, where Sprinto earns 5 of 5. The Audit Trail editorial desk Published Oct 18, 2026 In brief - Sprinto fits custom tests; Vanta fits teams that need FedRAMP or NIST 800-53. - Sprinto scores 84 and Vanta 82, both Strong, apart on one criterion. - Customisation is the gap: Sprinto 5 of 5, Vanta 4. - Vanta claims 400+ integrations and Sprinto 300+; both earn 5 of 5. - Both list plan names and no dollar figure; both score 1 on pricing transparency. Sprinto scores 84 and Vanta 82 on rubric v0.9, and both sit in the Strong band (70 to 84). They tie on seven of the eight criteria. Pick Sprinto if your team writes its own tests and wants one test to count toward several frameworks. Pick Vanta if you need FedRAMP or NIST 800-53 coverage, or want the larger G2 review count. Sprinto ranks first of seven and Vanta second. The gap is customisation alone, worth 2 points of the total. Scores as of 11 October 2026. Measure ![Sprinto logo](https://theauditrail.com/logos/sprinto.png)Sprinto ![Vanta logo](https://theauditrail.com/logos/vanta.png)Vanta **Total score** **84** /100 **82** /100 Band Strong (70 to 84) Strong (70 to 84) Rank 1st 2nd Framework coverage 5/5 5/5 Automated evidence 5/5 5/5 [vanta.com/integrations](https://www.vanta.com/integrations) Audit path 3/5 3/5 Pricing transparency 1/5 [sprinto.com/pricing/](https://sprinto.com/pricing/) 1/5 [vanta.com/pricing](https://www.vanta.com/pricing) Trust and questionnaires 4/5 4/5 Vendor risk management 5/5 5/5 Customisation 5/5 4/5 User sentiment 5/5 [g2.com/sellers/sprinto-technology-private-limited](https://www.g2.com/sellers/sprinto-technology-private-limited) 5/5 [g2.com/sellers/vanta](https://www.g2.com/sellers/vanta) ## What the scores share The two score the same on seven of the eight criteria: 5 of 5 on framework coverage, automated evidence, vendor risk management and user sentiment, 4 of 5 on trust and questionnaires, 3 of 5 on audit path and 1 of 5 on pricing transparency. Vanta claims more than 400 integrations and Sprinto more than 300, and both run continuous monitoring and document an API. Both name audit partner firms and give auditors access to evidence inside the platform, and neither sells the audit. Both sell vendor risk monitoring as an add-on. Both offer custom frameworks and custom automated tests. Both list plan names and no dollar figure, and both route buyers to a demo. Sprinto holds 4.7 from 1,685 reviews on G2 and Vanta 4.6 from 2,734. ## Where the scores split ### Customisation Sprinto scores 5 of 5 (weight: 10 points). Its unified control set is mapped across frameworks, so one test counts toward several of them. That is the top level on the customisation criterion. Vanta scores 4 of 5. It maps a single control to several frameworks, which is control-level mapping, and no test is shown to satisfy several frameworks at once. That one level is a 2-point difference in the weighted total, and the whole gap between the two. ### Frameworks in the matrix Vanta covers all ten frameworks in the site’s matrix: SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR, ISO 42001, NIST CSF, NIST 800-53, FedRAMP and CMMC. Sprinto covers eight of them, and FedRAMP and NIST 800-53 earn no credit. Sprinto separates the 25 or more frameworks it automates out of the box from the 200 or more it digitizes into mapped controls, and the rubric scores the automated set. ### Integration counts Vanta claims more than 400 integrations, including more than 40 AWS resources, 30 Azure resources and 25 Google Cloud Platform resources. Sprinto claims more than 300 integrations across cloud, identity, device management, scanners, CI/CD, ticketing and HR. ### AWS Marketplace figures Sprinto lists $7,500 a year for up to 100 employees, plus $2,000 a year for the first framework, $9,500 combined. Vanta starts at $14,000 a year for 1 to 20 employees. The bands differ, so the figures are not like for like. Both support SOC 2ISO 27001HIPAAPCI DSSGDPRISO 42001NIST CSFCMMC Where they differ ![Sprinto logo](https://theauditrail.com/logos/sprinto.png)Sprinto ![Vanta logo](https://theauditrail.com/logos/vanta.png)Vanta NIST 800-53 Sprinto: Not credited Vanta: Supported FedRAMP Sprinto: Not credited Vanta: Supported Supported Not listed Not credited ## Which one to buy Sprinto fits a team that writes its own tests and expects to add frameworks. It scores 84, the highest total of the seven, with custom tests and cross-framework mapping. Sprinto ranks [1st of seven](https://theauditrail.com/vendors/sprinto/), with 4.7 from [1,685 G2 reviews](https://theauditrail.com/vendors/sprinto/#full-review). Vanta fits a team that needs FedRAMP or NIST 800-53 coverage, wants to check its stack against a list of 400 or more integrations, or wants the larger review count. Vanta ranks [2nd of seven](https://theauditrail.com/vendors/vanta/) at 82, with 4.6 from [2,734 G2 reviews](https://theauditrail.com/vendors/vanta/#full-review). Sprinto was founded in 2020 and says more than 4,000 companies use the platform. Vanta was founded in 2018 and says more than 16,000 companies use it. Both score above [Drata](https://theauditrail.com/vendors/drata/) at 76. The [ranked alternatives to Vanta](https://theauditrail.com/best/vanta-alternatives/) lead with Sprinto, and the [Vanta vs Drata](https://theauditrail.com/compare/vanta-vs-drata/) comparison covers the other close pair. ## Conclusion Sprinto 84 and Vanta 82 are 2 points apart. Sprinto gains 2 points on customisation (5 against 4), and the two score the same on the other seven criteria. For a team that writes its own tests across several frameworks, Sprinto fits better. For a team that needs FedRAMP or NIST 800-53, Vanta fits better. ## Frequently asked questions - Should I choose Sprinto or Vanta? Choose Sprinto if your team writes its own tests and wants one test to count toward several frameworks. It scores 84 against Vanta's 82. Choose Vanta if you need FedRAMP or NIST 800-53 coverage, or want the larger G2 review count. - Why does Sprinto score higher than Vanta? Customisation alone. Sprinto scores 5 of 5 because its unified control set is mapped across frameworks, so one test counts toward several. Vanta scores 4 because it maps a control to several frameworks and shows no test that satisfies several at once. The other seven criteria score the same. - Which has more integrations, Sprinto or Vanta? Vanta claims more than 400 and Sprinto more than 300. Both earn 5 of 5 on automated evidence. - Do Sprinto and Vanta cover the same frameworks? Both score 5 of 5 on framework coverage. Vanta covers all ten frameworks in the site's matrix. Sprinto covers eight, and FedRAMP and NIST 800-53 earn no credit. - How much do Sprinto and Vanta cost? Both list plan names and no dollar figure. On AWS Marketplace, Sprinto lists $9,500 a year for up to 100 employees, and Vanta starts at $14,000 a year for 1 to 20 employees. Full scorecards [![Sprinto logo](https://theauditrail.com/logos/sprinto.png)Sprinto, 84/100](/vendors/sprinto/)[ ![Vanta logo](https://theauditrail.com/logos/vanta.png)Vanta, 82/100](/vendors/vanta/) Both scored on rubric v0.9. [How we score](https://theauditrail.com/rubric/)