Five Vanta alternatives scored on an eight-criterion rubric and ranked by evidence. Sprinto leads at 82 out of 100. All scores Provisional, September 2026.
Sprinto is the best Vanta alternative among the five platforms scored against our eight-criterion rubric, leading at 82 out of 100. It automates more than 25 frameworks out of the box, connects to more than 300 integrations, and maps controls across certifications so a single test counts toward SOC 2, ISO 27001, and HIPAA compliance at once.
Vanta scores 75 on its detailed scorecard and remains a strong platform. It has the largest published integration count (400 or more) and the largest G2 review base (2,723 reviews) in the six-platform ranking. The five alternatives below score between 47 and 82.
Vanta
75/100 Strong
The widest integration and framework catalog in this set. The audit path and customisation are where it gives up points.
Best for buying the audit and the platform together
47/100
From $8,700 a year for the platform and $5,800 a year for the SOC 2 audit (AWS Marketplace listing)
Delivered in-platform by Thoropass Assurance, a licensed CPA firm
4.7/5 (612 G2)
What Vanta offers and where the five differ
Vanta covers more than 35 frameworks including the SOC 2 framework and ISO 27001, on a platform with more than 400 integrations. It connects to a partner auditor network (or your own auditor) for the actual report, publishes no dollar figure on its pricing page, and caps AI questionnaire answering by plan tier.
Four things the alternatives offer that Vanta does not:
Thoropass delivers the audit itself. Vanta routes you to an outside CPA firm. Thoropass describes Thoropass Assurance as an in-house licensed CPA firm that produces the report.
Secureframe publishes a starting price. Its Fundamentals plan starts at $7,000 a year on secureframe.com. Vanta’s pricing page shows four plan names and no numbers.
Drata offers no-code custom tests. Adaptive Automation lets teams build automated controls without writing code. Vanta’s custom automated tests are not confirmed on its own pages.
Scrut carries the highest G2 average in the set.Scrut’s 4.9 from 1,312 reviews compares with Vanta’s 4.6 from 2,723.
Each platform was scored against the published scoring criteria weighted by day-to-day impact on a compliance team. Automated evidence collection carries the most weight at 20 points, because it is the core job these platforms replace. Framework coverage and audit path follow at 15 points each. Pricing transparency, trust and questionnaires, vendor risk management, customization, and user sentiment each carry 10.
Ranks follow the rubric totals. Tied totals share a rank: Drata and Secureframe both score 73, so they share rank 2 and the next rank is 4. Vanta itself scores 75 on the same rubric but does not appear as a ranked entry on its own alternatives page.
A capability we could not confirm on a vendor’s own pages scores as absent. Every score is Provisional, from public documentation. Scores as of September 2026.
Criterion
Weight
Automated evidence
20%
Framework coverage
15%
Audit path
15%
Pricing transparency
10%
Trust and questionnaires
10%
Vendor risk management
10%
Customisation
10%
User sentiment
10%
1. Sprinto: Best overall Vanta alternative
82/100
Strong
Sprinto product page, captured 24 September 2026
Sprinto scores 82 on the rubric, placing it first of the five alternatives rated here. It automates more than 25 frameworks out of the box and covers more than 300 integrations with continuous monitoring. Its unified control set maps one test toward multiple certifications, which reduces repeat work when a team stacks SOC 2 with ISO 27001 or HIPAA. The trust center generates directly from existing compliance data, and AI questionnaire answering is included on the entry tier at 20 responses a year. Vendor risk management covers automated discovery, AI document review, and periodic vendor reviews. No dollar figure appears on sprinto.com.
Best for
Best overall Vanta alternative
Score
82/100
Pricing
Not published. Plan names only.
Audit
Partner auditors, or bring your own
Frameworks confirmed
8 of 10
Integrations
300+ claimed
Rating
4.7/5 (1,683 G2 reviews)
Watch for
No published price on any plan
Strengths
The highest total on the rubric
Custom tests and cross-framework mapping
Clear split between automated and merely mapped frameworks
Limitations
No published price on any plan
The audit itself is still a separate engagement
The most complete platform on the rubric. It loses points on price, since no number appears anywhere on its site.
Drata scores 73, tying with Secureframe for second in this list. Its no-code custom tests (Adaptive Automation) let compliance teams build automated controls without writing code, a capability not confirmed on Vanta's own pages. The trust center is built on the SafeBase acquisition, and the third-party risk module pulls documents from a vendor's trust center to run assessments automatically. All ten frameworks in our matrix have their own product page on drata.com. Drata does not publish a price or an integration count; its site describes the catalog as "hundreds of tools."
Best for
Best for building no-code custom tests
Score
73/100
Pricing
Not published. Three plan names.
Audit
Outside auditor, with an Audit Hub for evidence review
Frameworks confirmed
10 of 10
Integrations
"Hundreds", no number published
Rating
4.7/5 (1,395 G2 reviews)
Watch for
No integration count published
Strengths
No-code custom tests
Automated review of vendor documents
Public API and custom connections
Limitations
No integration count published
Custom frameworks cost extra below Enterprise
Strong on custom automation and vendor risk. Drata publishes no integration count and no price, which holds its score down.
2=. Secureframe: Best for federal and defense frameworks
73/100
Strong
Secureframe homepage, captured 24 September 2026
Secureframe scores 73, tying with Drata for second. It is the only platform of the five that publishes a starting price on its own site: the Fundamentals plan begins at $7,000 a year. Its framework list covers about 33 named frameworks, including a dedicated defense product tier for CMMC 2.0, NIST 800-53 High, and FedRAMP. Custom frameworks, controls, and tests come included on the base plan rather than as an add-on. The advanced third-party risk module sits on the higher Complete tier, and its features were not detailed on Secureframe's public pages.
Best for
Best for federal and defense frameworks
Score
73/100
Pricing
From $7,000 a year (Fundamentals plan)
Audit
Audit Partner Network
Frameworks confirmed
10 of 10
Integrations
300+ claimed
Rating
4.7/5 (814 G2 reviews)
Watch for
Vendor risk depth sits on a higher plan
Strengths
The only published starting price in the set
Custom tests on the base plan
Deep federal coverage
Limitations
Vendor risk depth sits on a higher plan
Higher plans show no price
The only vendor here that prints a real starting price, and the deepest federal framework list. Vendor risk detail was thin on its public pages.
4. Scrut: Best for regional frameworks outside the US
63/100
Adequate
Scrut homepage, captured 24 September 2026
Scrut scores 63 and ranks fourth in this list. Its 4.9 G2 average from 1,312 reviews is the highest of any platform in this set, including Vanta. The framework list covers more than 70 frameworks, with regional standards such as MAS TRM for Singapore, SAMA for Saudi Arabia, and RBI for India. FedRAMP is absent from its list. Scrut's pricing page returns a 404, and no plan details appear on scrut.io. With 150 or more published integrations, it has the smallest published count of the five here.
Best for
Best for regional frameworks outside the US
Score
63/100
Pricing
Not published. The pricing page returns a 404.
Audit
Outside auditor, with an Audit Center for evidence review
Frameworks confirmed
9 of 10
Integrations
150+ claimed
Rating
4.9/5 (1,312 G2 reviews)
Watch for
No pricing page at all
Strengths
Highest G2 average of the six
Regional frameworks few rivals carry
Custom monitors and cross-framework mapping
Limitations
No pricing page at all
The smallest integration count published here
The highest user rating in the set and a long list of regional frameworks. A smaller integration catalog and no pricing page cost it the most.
5. Thoropass: Best for buying the audit and the platform together
47/100
Limited
Thoropass homepage, captured 24 September 2026
Thoropass scores 47 and ranks fifth. It is the only platform here that delivers the audit itself. Thoropass describes Thoropass Assurance as its in-house licensed CPA firm, registered with the AICPA. Starting prices appear on its AWS Marketplace listing at $8,700 a year for the platform including the first framework, and $5,800 a year for a SOC 2 audit subscription. Trust center, questionnaire tooling, vendor risk management, and custom frameworks were not confirmed on thoropass.com. Thoropass has 612 G2 reviews for the platform and a separate listing with 585 reviews for the audit service.
Best for
Best for buying the audit and the platform together
Score
47/100
Pricing
From $8,700 a year for the platform and $5,800 a year for the SOC 2 audit (AWS Marketplace listing)
Audit
Delivered in-platform by Thoropass Assurance, a licensed CPA firm
Frameworks confirmed
7 of 10
Integrations
No number published
Rating
4.7/5 (612 G2 reviews)
Watch for
No integration count published
Strengths
The audit and the platform from one company
Published starting prices for platform and audit
A strong review base for both products
Limitations
No integration count published
Trust and vendor risk tooling not confirmed
The only vendor that delivers the audit itself, through its own licensed CPA firm. Much of the rest of the platform could not be confirmed on its public pages.
The platform subscription, even where vendors publish a price, is only part of the total cost. The audit is a separate engagement for Sprinto, Drata, Secureframe, and Scrut, paid to whichever CPA firm you choose through a partner network or your own auditor. A-LIGN, a licensed firm, puts the range for a SOC 2 audit at $20,000 to $150,000 or more, depending on company size, scope, and report type.
Thoropass is the exception. Its SOC 2 audit subscription starts at $5,800 a year on its AWS Marketplace listing, bundled into the same vendor relationship as the platform.
On their own sites, only Secureframe shows a starting price ($7,000 a year for Fundamentals). On AWS Marketplace, all six vendors list prices. For platform plus one framework, the five alternatives sort as follows: Thoropass $8,700 (first framework included), Sprinto $9,500, Scrut $15,000 (up to 20 employees), Secureframe $15,000, and Drata $32,500 ($25,000 platform fee plus $7,500 per framework, for a 100-person company). Thoropass’s $5,800 audit subscription is separate. Vanta Essentials starts at $14,000 for 1 to 20 employees.
When Vanta is the right call
Vanta publishes the largest integration count in this set, at more than 400. A team whose stack depends on a niche connector is more likely to find it already built. Vanta says its trust center product hosts more than 6,000 pages. It also carries the most reviewed profile in this category at 2,723 G2 reviews. For teams where ecosystem breadth and proven scale matter more than rubric score, Vanta remains a reasonable choice.
Federal contracting or defense: Secureframe carries the deepest documented federal coverage of the five, with a dedicated product tier for CMMC 2.0 and FedRAMP.
Regional compliance outside the US: Scrut lists regional frameworks such as MAS TRM, SAMA, and RBI.
The audit and the platform from one vendor: Thoropass is the only option of the five. Its audit is delivered inside the platform by what Thoropass describes as a licensed CPA firm, not through a referral.
No-code compliance automation: Drata’s Adaptive Automation lets teams build custom controls without writing code. Custom tests are also available on Secureframe’s base plan and through Sprinto’s programmable monitors.
Best for buying the audit and the platform together
47/100
From $8,700 a year for the platform and $5,800 a year for the SOC 2 audit (AWS Marketplace listing)
Delivered in-platform by Thoropass Assurance, a licensed CPA firm
4.7/5 (612 G2)
Conclusion
Sprinto earns the top position in this list at 82 out of 100, with more than 25 automated frameworks, more than 300 integrations, and cross-framework control mapping that lets one test count toward multiple certifications. For teams that need a published starting price before a sales call, Secureframe starts at $7,000 a year. For teams that want the audit and the platform from one company, Thoropass is the only option among these five.
Every score is Provisional, based on public documentation from September 2026.
Sprinto, at 82 out of 100 on the rubric. It automates more than 25 frameworks out of the box, covers more than 300 integrations, and maps controls across certifications so that a single test counts toward multiple frameworks. For federal and defense work, Secureframe has the deepest documented coverage. For teams that want the audit bundled, Thoropass is the only option. All scores are Provisional, September 2026.
Is the audit included in any Vanta alternative?
Thoropass is the only platform of the five that delivers the audit itself, through Thoropass Assurance, which Thoropass describes as its in-house licensed CPA firm. The other four (Sprinto, Drata, Secureframe, Scrut) connect you to an external auditor through a partner network or a bring-your-own-auditor arrangement, the same model Vanta uses.
Do any Vanta alternatives publish their price?
On their own sites, only Secureframe publishes a starting price ($7,000 a year for Fundamentals). On AWS Marketplace, all six vendors list prices. For platform plus one framework, the five alternatives range from Thoropass at $8,700 (first framework included) to Drata at $32,500 ($25,000 platform fee plus $7,500 per framework, for 100 employees).