Scorecard

Scrut Scorecard

63
Adequate 5th Provisional

Desk assessment from public documentation, September 2026

Verdict

The highest user rating in the set and a long list of regional frameworks. A smaller integration catalog and no pricing page cost it the most.

Best for regional frameworks outside the US.

Scrut homepage showing compliance automation platform with Evidence Task dashboard displaying evidence collections, status and gaps metrics
Scrut homepage, captured 24 September 2026

Strengths

  • Highest G2 average of the six
  • Regional frameworks few rivals carry
  • Custom monitors and cross-framework mapping

Limitations

  • No pricing page at all
  • The smallest integration count published here
  • Framework coverage15% of total
    5/5

    70+ frameworks, including regional sets such as MAS TRM, SAMA and RBI. FedRAMP is not on the list.

    Level 5: All of level 3, plus three or more of ISO 42001, NIST CSF, NIST 800-53, FedRAMP or CMMC.

  • Automated evidence20% of total
    3/5

    150+ integrations with continuous evidence checks.

    Level 3: 100 to 199 published integrations, with continuous automated control tests.

  • Audit path15% of total
    2/5

    An Audit Center where auditors share and track evidence. A named audit partner network was not confirmed.

    Level 2: A named partner network of audit firms, or auditors can review evidence inside the platform.

  • Pricing transparency10% of total
    0/5

    The pricing page returns a 404, and no plan details are published on scrut.io.

    Level 0: No price and no plan details published by the vendor.

  • Trust and questionnaires10% of total
    4/5

    A trust center with automated questionnaire answering through Scrut's AI teammates.

    Level 4: Both, with AI-assisted questionnaire answering.

  • Vendor risk management10% of total
    1/5

    A dedicated vendor risk product page. Its features beyond an inventory were not confirmed.

    Level 1: A vendor inventory only.

  • Customisation10% of total
    5/5

    Custom frameworks, custom monitors, and a unified control framework mapped across standards.

    Level 5: Custom frameworks, custom automated tests, and control mapping across frameworks so one test satisfies several.

  • User sentiment10% of total
    5/5

    4.9 out of 5 from 1,312 reviews on G2, the highest average in this set.

    Level 5: Average 4.5 or higher with 200 or more reviews.

Not confirmed from public pages

  • Public API
  • Vendor risk features beyond inventory
  • Any published pricing

Scrut can send us the public page that confirms any of these. If confirmed, the score updates and the change is logged.

Sources

  1. Scrut homepage read 2026-09-23
  2. Scrut all frameworks read 2026-09-23
  3. Scrut trust center read 2026-09-23
  4. Scrut vendor risk management read 2026-09-23
  5. Scrut custom frameworks read 2026-09-23
  6. G2 listing read 2026-09-23
  7. Growth round announcement read 2026-09-23