Ranking

Best Drata Alternatives and Competitors (2026)

Five Drata alternatives scored on an eight-criterion rubric and ranked by evidence. Sprinto leads at 84 out of 100, eight points above Drata. Updated October 2026.

Some vendors pay us to be assessed or listed. Payment never changes a score, a rank or a verdict.

The best Drata alternative is Sprinto, at 84 out of 100 on the rubric against Drata’s 76. Sprinto lists more than 300 integrations, where Drata’s site says “hundreds”, and earns 5 of 5 on customisation and vendor risk, where Drata earns 4. Vanta follows at 82, Secureframe at 75, Scrut at 72 and Thoropass at 52.

Drata scores 76 on its scorecard, third of the seven platforms, with 4.7 on G2 from 1,397 reviews. The Vanta alternatives ranking places it second at the same 76.

Drata
76/100 Strong (70 to 84)

Strong on custom automation, vendor risk and a named network of audit firms. Drata prints no price on its website and describes its integrations only as "hundreds", which holds its score down.

Drata scorecard
Platforms at a glance
Platform Best for Score Starting price Audit Rating
Best overall Drata alternative 84/100 Not published. Plan names only. Partner auditors, or bring your own 4.7/5 (1,685 G2)
Best for integration breadth and review volume 82/100 Not published. Four plan names. Partner auditors, or bring your own 4.6/5 (2,734 G2)
Best for a price you can read before a sales call 75/100 From $7,500 a year (Fundamentals plan) Audit Partner Network 4.7/5 (829 G2)
Best for the highest G2 rating 72/100 Not published. Partner-network auditors, with an Audit Center for evidence review 4.9/5 (1,328 G2)
Best for buying the audit and the platform together 52/100 Not published. Delivered in-platform by Thoropass Assurance, a licensed CPA firm 4.7/5 (585 G2)

Why teams look beyond Drata

Drata calls itself an agentic trust management platform. Compliance Automation and Enterprise GRC collect evidence and run control tests, and the Assurance Platform track lists a branded trust center with up to 100 approved domains and questionnaire assistance for 10 questionnaires on its Foundation plan. Drata launched a standalone TPRM product in September 2026 and says it serves more than 8,500 customers.

G2’s complaint themes for Drata, drawn from its reviews, are limited integrations (43 mentions), integration issues (38), improvements needed (35), lack of clarity (28) and UX improvement (22). A September 2026 review rated 0 out of 5 says “most interactions are now handled by AI agents that provide repetitive and often unhelpful responses.” Drata says its assistant is the first point of contact, with a human on request.

Customer support is also the largest praise theme on the same G2 summary, at 135 mentions. The 0 out of 5 review is one reviewer’s account.

Support models differ. Drata offers chat and ticket support 24 hours a day, 5 days a week. Sprinto’s Growth plan adds 24x5 priority email support and a dedicated customer success manager. Secureframe publishes a 49 minute median email response. Scrut lists implementation managers.

Price is the other pressure point. drata.com prints no dollar figure, and custom frameworks are an add-on on both the Advanced and Enterprise plans. Its AWS Marketplace listings show $15,000 a year for 1 to 50 employees and $32,500 for 100 employees with one framework.

Where the five alternatives publish or score more than Drata:

  • Published integration counts. Vanta lists more than 400, and Sprinto and Secureframe more than 300. Drata’s site says “hundreds”.
  • A price on the vendor’s website. Secureframe prints $7,500 a year for Fundamentals.
  • Audit path. Thoropass earns 5 of 5, and Drata earns 3.
  • User ratings. Scrut’s G2 average is 4.9, and Drata’s is 4.7.

How we ranked these

Alternatives rank by weighted total on the rubric. The criteria run in priority order by weight: automated evidence (20 points), framework coverage and audit path (15 each), then pricing transparency, trust and questionnaires, vendor risk management, customisation and user sentiment (10 each). Only prices on a vendor’s website count toward pricing transparency, so AWS Marketplace figures earn no points.

Drata’s 76 sits on the same scale, and Drata is the subject of the page with no entry. A capability counts when the vendor lists it on any plan or add-on. Scores as of 11 October 2026.

Criterion Weight
Automated evidence 20%
Framework coverage 15%
Audit path 15%
Pricing transparency 10%
Trust and questionnaires 10%
Vendor risk management 10%
Customisation 10%
User sentiment 10%

1. Sprinto: Best overall Drata alternative

84/100
Strong (70 to 84)
Sprinto continuous compliance page showing Health dashboard with entity checks and monitoring status, Compliance readiness gauge, and Infosec summary with passing and failing control counts
Sprinto product page, captured 24 September 2026

Sprinto scores 84, eight points above Drata. It publishes more than 300 integrations where Drata's site says "hundreds", and it automates more than 25 frameworks out of the box. On customisation it earns 5 of 5 (custom frameworks, programmable monitors, cross-framework mapping) to Drata's 4, and on vendor risk it earns 5 of 5 to Drata's 4. The Growth plan adds programmable monitors for custom tests, 24x5 priority email support and a dedicated customer success manager. The audit stays a separate engagement, as it does at Drata. Sprinto's AWS Marketplace listing shows a $7,500 starter platform for up to 100 employees and a first framework at $2,000, which makes $9,500 a year. Drata's 100-employee listing totals $32,500 with one framework.

Best for
Best overall Drata alternative
Score
84/100
Pricing
Not published. Plan names only. sprinto.com/pricing/
Audit
Partner auditors, or bring your own
Frameworks covered
8 of 10
Integrations
300+ claimed
Watch for
No price on its website on any plan

Strengths

  • The highest total on the rubric
  • Custom tests and cross-framework mapping
  • Clear split between automated and merely mapped frameworks

Limitations

  • No price on its website on any plan
  • The audit itself is still a separate engagement

The most complete platform on the rubric. It loses points on price, since no number appears anywhere on its site.

Full Sprinto scorecard

2. Vanta: Best for integration breadth and review volume

82/100
Strong (70 to 84)
Vanta homepage showing compliance automation dashboard with ISO 42001 framework setup and control monitoring
Vanta homepage, captured 24 September 2026

Vanta scores 82, six points above Drata. The gap is integrations and vendor risk, each 5 against Drata's 4. Vanta lists more than 400 integrations, and Drata prints no number on drata.com. Vanta also carries the largest G2 base of the five, with more than 2,700 reviews at 4.6, against Drata's 4.7 from 1,397. Both vendors send buyers to partner audit firms. Vanta says more than 100 firms support its customers, and Drata says more than 175 belong to its Auditor Alliance. Its AI questionnaire answering allows 25 a year on Plus and 144 on Professional. A 1 to 20 employee organization starts at $14,000 a year on its AWS Marketplace listing.

Best for
Best for integration breadth and review volume
Score
82/100
Pricing
Not published. Four plan names. vanta.com/pricing
Audit
Partner auditors, or bring your own
Frameworks covered
10 of 10
Integrations
400+ claimed vanta.com/integrations
Rating
4.6/5 (2,734 G2 reviews) g2.com/sellers/vanta
Watch for
No price on its website

Strengths

  • 400+ integrations
  • Largest verified review base in the set
  • Covers every framework in our matrix

Limitations

  • No price on its website
  • Questionnaire answering is capped per plan

The largest integration catalog in the SOC 2 ranking, with 5 of 5 on vendor risk. Pricing transparency is its weakest criterion, since no price appears on its site. Its audit path scores 3 of 5.

Full Vanta scorecard

3. Secureframe: Best for a price you can read before a sales call

75/100
Strong (70 to 84)
Secureframe homepage showing compliance automation platform with Tasks panel, Tests and Standards dashboards
Secureframe homepage, captured 24 September 2026

Secureframe scores 75, one point below Drata. Its Fundamentals plan starts at $7,500 a year on secureframe.com, and drata.com prints no dollar figure. Custom frameworks, controls and tests come on the base plan, while Drata lists custom frameworks as an add-on. Secureframe lists 300+ integrations and about 33 named frameworks, with a Defense plan for CMMC. Vendor risk is where a Drata buyer gives up the most. Secureframe earns 2 of 5 there, with the advanced third-party module on the Complete plan, and Drata earns 4. Secureframe publishes a 49 minute median email response and a 30 second live chat response.

Best for
Best for a price you can read before a sales call
Score
75/100
Pricing
From $7,500 a year (Fundamentals plan) secureframe.com/pricing
Audit
Audit Partner Network
Frameworks covered
10 of 10
Integrations
300+ claimed secureframe.com/integrations
Rating
4.7/5 (829 G2 reviews) g2.com/sellers/secureframe
Watch for
Vendor risk depth sits on the Complete plan

Strengths

  • The only starting price on a vendor website in the set
  • Custom tests on the base plan
  • Deep federal coverage

Limitations

  • Vendor risk depth sits on the Complete plan
  • Higher plans show no price

The only vendor here that prints a real starting price on its website, and the deepest federal framework list. Vendor risk is its weakest criterion.

Full Secureframe scorecard

4. Scrut: Best for the highest G2 rating

72/100
Strong (70 to 84)
Scrut homepage showing compliance automation platform with Evidence Task dashboard displaying evidence collections, status and gaps metrics
Scrut homepage, captured 24 September 2026

Scrut scores 72 and holds the top G2 average of the five, 4.9 from more than 1,300 reviews. Drata sits at 4.7 from 1,397. Scrut's site lists 70+ frameworks, including regional standards such as MAS TRM, SAMA and RBI. It earns 4 of 5 on customisation, level with Drata, and 5 of 5 on vendor risk to Drata's 4. Its 150 or more integrations trail the counts that Sprinto, Vanta and Secureframe publish. Implementation managers and dedicated InfoSec managers form part of the service. Scrut earns 0 of 5 on pricing transparency, because scrut.io shows no plans and its pricing page link returns a 404. AWS Marketplace lists $15,000 a year for up to 20 employees.

Best for
Best for the highest G2 rating
Score
72/100
Pricing
Not published.
Audit
Partner-network auditors, with an Audit Center for evidence review
Frameworks covered
9 of 10
Integrations
150+ claimed
Rating
4.9/5 (1,328 G2 reviews) g2.com/sellers/scrut-automation
Watch for
No pricing page at all

Strengths

  • Highest G2 average in the set
  • Regional frameworks few rivals carry
  • Cross-framework control mapping

Limitations

  • No pricing page at all
  • The smallest integration count published here

The highest user rating in the set and a long list of regional frameworks. A smaller integration catalog and no pricing page cost it the most.

Full Scrut scorecard

5. Thoropass: Best for buying the audit and the platform together

52/100
Limited (35 to 54)
Thoropass homepage showing One Platform Every Framework section with Risk Health and Risk Response dashboards alongside SOC 2 and ISO 27001 framework cards
Thoropass homepage, captured 24 September 2026

Thoropass scores 52. Thoropass describes Thoropass Assurance as its licensed CPA firm, and that firm issues the report, which no other vendor of the five does. Drata connects buyers to outside firms through the Auditor Alliance. On AWS Marketplace, Thoropass lists a platform subscription from $8,700 a year, including the first framework, and a SOC 2 audit subscription from $5,800 a year. Thoropass earns 0 of 5 on vendor risk and on customisation, where Drata earns 4 on each. It earns 1 of 5 on automated evidence, against Drata's 4. Its trust center runs on a custom domain with public, private and NDA-gated documents. Its G2 profile shows 585 reviews at 4.7 for the platform.

Best for
Best for buying the audit and the platform together
Score
52/100
Pricing
Not published.
Audit
Delivered in-platform by Thoropass Assurance, a licensed CPA firm
Frameworks covered
8 of 10
Integrations
No number published thoropass.com/platform/integrations
Rating
4.7/5 (585 G2 reviews) g2.com/sellers/thoropass
Watch for
No integration count published

Strengths

  • The audit and the platform from one company
  • A trust center with NDA-gated documents
  • AI-powered security questionnaires

Limitations

  • No integration count published
  • No credit for vendor risk tooling
  • No price on its website

The only vendor that delivers the audit itself, through its own licensed CPA firm. It scores 0 of 5 on vendor risk, customisation and pricing transparency, and 1 of 5 on automated evidence.

Full Thoropass scorecard

Beyond the headline price

The audit is its own invoice at Sprinto, Vanta, Secureframe, Scrut and Drata, paid to an outside CPA firm. Thoropass lists a SOC 2 audit subscription from $5,800 a year on AWS Marketplace.

Drata’s 100-employee listing on AWS Marketplace is a $25,000 platform fee, with each framework as its own $7,500 line. SOC 2, ISO 27001 and HIPAA together add three lines. In the same band, the pricing study shows Sprinto at $9,500 and Secureframe at $15,000, each including a first framework.

Other AWS Marketplace listings sit in different headcount bands:

  • Up to 100 employees: Sprinto at $7,500 for the platform plus $2,000 for a first framework, and Secureframe at $7,500 plus $7,500.
  • 1 to 20 or up to 20 employees: Vanta from $14,000 and Scrut at $15,000.
  • 1 to 50 employees: Drata’s Foundation Package at $15,000.
  • No band stated: Thoropass at $8,700 for the platform, including the first framework.

Prices compare only within one band, and any of them is a starting point for a quote request.

How Drata scores against Secureframe, Scrut and Thoropass

Drata totals 76 against 75 for Secureframe, 72 for Scrut and 52 for Thoropass. Criterion by criterion:

  • Vendor risk: Drata 4 leads Secureframe at 2 and Thoropass at 0, and trails Scrut at 5.
  • Automated evidence: Drata 4 leads Scrut at 3 and Thoropass at 1, and trails Secureframe at 5.
  • Audit path: Drata 3 leads Secureframe at 2, is level with Scrut at 3, and trails Thoropass at 5.
  • Customisation: Drata, Secureframe and Scrut all score 4, and Thoropass scores 0.
  • Pricing transparency: Drata 1 leads Scrut and Thoropass at 0, and trails Secureframe at 2.
  • Framework coverage: Drata 5 is level with Secureframe, Scrut and Thoropass.
  • Trust and questionnaires: Drata and all three score 4.
  • User sentiment: Drata and all three score 5.

Drata pulls documents from a vendor’s trust center to run vendor assessments. It says more than 175 audit firms belong to its Auditor Alliance, including A-LIGN, Coalfire and Armanino, and auditors work in its Audit Hub. Adaptive Automation lets a team build no-code custom tests. Drata’s 1,397 G2 reviews are more than Scrut, Secureframe or Thoropass has.

Against Sprinto and Vanta, Drata trails on total. Its vendor risk score of 4 is a point below theirs.

Which alternative fits which buyer

Integration breadth: Vanta lists more than 400 integrations and Sprinto more than 300. Vanta and Drata differ on integrations and vendor risk.

A first multi-framework program: Sprinto counts one test toward several frameworks.

A published price: Secureframe is the one platform here with a starting price listed on secureframe.com.

Highest user ratings, or regional frameworks: Scrut has the top G2 average and lists MAS TRM, SAMA and RBI.

The audit and the platform from one vendor: Thoropass describes Thoropass Assurance as its licensed CPA firm, and no other vendor here has its own firm issue the report.

Staying with Drata: Drata scores 4 on vendor risk, above Secureframe and Thoropass. Drata is third of six in the SOC 2 compliance software ranking.

Summary

Platforms at a glance
Rank Platform Best for Score Starting price Audit Rating
1 Best overall Drata alternative 84/100 Not published. Plan names only. Partner auditors, or bring your own 4.7/5 (1,685 G2)
2 Best for integration breadth and review volume 82/100 Not published. Four plan names. Partner auditors, or bring your own 4.6/5 (2,734 G2)
3 Best for a price you can read before a sales call 75/100 From $7,500 a year (Fundamentals plan) Audit Partner Network 4.7/5 (829 G2)
4 Best for the highest G2 rating 72/100 Not published. Partner-network auditors, with an Audit Center for evidence review 4.9/5 (1,328 G2)
5 Best for buying the audit and the platform together 52/100 Not published. Delivered in-platform by Thoropass Assurance, a licensed CPA firm 4.7/5 (585 G2)

Conclusion

Sprinto takes first place at 84 out of 100. Its edge over Drata is automated evidence, vendor risk and customisation, 5 against 4 on each, and a published integration count of more than 300 where Drata’s site says “hundreds”. Vanta suits integration breadth, Secureframe a price on its website, Scrut the highest G2 average, and Thoropass an audit report from Thoropass Assurance, which it describes as its licensed CPA firm. Drata scores above Secureframe, Scrut and Thoropass overall.

Scores as of October 2026.

Missing a platform? Get it assessed

Frequently asked questions

  • What is the best Drata alternative?

    Sprinto, at 84 out of 100 on the rubric against Drata's 76. It publishes more than 300 integrations, automates more than 25 frameworks and earns 5 of 5 on customisation. Vanta is second at 82 and lists more than 400 integrations. Secureframe suits buyers who want a price on its website, and Thoropass suits buyers who want Thoropass Assurance to deliver the audit.

  • Why do teams look for a Drata alternative?

    G2's AI-generated summary of Drata reviews lists limited integrations (43 mentions) and integration issues (38) as the two largest complaint themes. Improvements needed (35), lack of clarity (28) and UX improvement (22) follow. One 0 out of 5 review from September 2026 says most support interactions are handled by AI agents. Customer support is also the top praise theme on the same G2 summary, at 135 mentions.

  • Is Drata more expensive than its alternatives?

    At 100 employees, Drata's AWS Marketplace listing totals $32,500 with one framework, a $25,000 platform fee plus $7,500 per framework. Sprinto's listing for up to 100 employees is $9,500 with a first framework, and Secureframe's is $15,000. The other listings use different headcount bands. Drata's $15,000 Foundation Package covers 1 to 50 employees, Vanta's $14,000 covers 1 to 20, Scrut's $15,000 covers up to 20, and Thoropass states no band at $8,700. Figures from different bands cannot be compared, so a quote from each vendor settles the cost.

  • Do any Drata alternatives include the audit?

    Thoropass is the only one of the five that issues the audit report itself. Thoropass describes Thoropass Assurance as its licensed CPA firm, and its AWS Marketplace listing shows a SOC 2 audit subscription from $5,800 a year. Sprinto, Vanta, Secureframe and Scrut connect buyers to outside audit firms, the same model Drata uses through its Auditor Alliance.

  • Does Drata publish how many integrations it has?

    drata.com says "hundreds of tools" and gives no number. Vanta publishes more than 400, Sprinto and Secureframe more than 300, and Scrut more than 150.

  • Which Drata alternative has the best reviews?

    Scrut has the highest G2 average of the five, 4.9 from more than 1,300 reviews. Vanta has the largest review base, with more than 2,700 reviews at 4.6. Sprinto and Secureframe sit at 4.7, the same average as Drata.