Sprinto vs Vanta: A Scored Comparison

Sprinto scores 84 and Vanta 82 on rubric v0.9, and both sit in the Strong band (70 to 84). They tie on seven of the eight criteria. Pick Sprinto if your team writes its own tests and wants one test to count toward several frameworks. Pick Vanta if you need FedRAMP or NIST 800-53 coverage, or want the larger G2 review count.

Sprinto ranks first of seven and Vanta second. The gap is customisation alone, worth 2 points of the total. Scores as of 11 October 2026.

What the scores share

The two score the same on seven of the eight criteria: 5 of 5 on framework coverage, automated evidence, vendor risk management and user sentiment, 4 of 5 on trust and questionnaires, 3 of 5 on audit path and 1 of 5 on pricing transparency.

Vanta claims more than 400 integrations and Sprinto more than 300, and both run continuous monitoring and document an API. Both name audit partner firms and give auditors access to evidence inside the platform, and neither sells the audit. Both sell vendor risk monitoring as an add-on. Both offer custom frameworks and custom automated tests.

Both list plan names and no dollar figure, and both route buyers to a demo. Sprinto holds 4.7 from 1,685 reviews on G2 and Vanta 4.6 from 2,734.

Where the scores split

Customisation

Sprinto scores 5 of 5 (weight: 10 points). Its unified control set is mapped across frameworks, so one test counts toward several of them. That is the top level on the customisation criterion.

Vanta scores 4 of 5. It maps a single control to several frameworks, which is control-level mapping, and no test is shown to satisfy several frameworks at once. That one level is a 2-point difference in the weighted total, and the whole gap between the two.

Frameworks in the matrix

Vanta covers all ten frameworks in the site’s matrix: SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR, ISO 42001, NIST CSF, NIST 800-53, FedRAMP and CMMC.

Sprinto covers eight of them, and FedRAMP and NIST 800-53 earn no credit. Sprinto separates the 25 or more frameworks it automates out of the box from the 200 or more it digitizes into mapped controls, and the rubric scores the automated set.

Integration counts

Vanta claims more than 400 integrations, including more than 40 AWS resources, 30 Azure resources and 25 Google Cloud Platform resources.

Sprinto claims more than 300 integrations across cloud, identity, device management, scanners, CI/CD, ticketing and HR.

AWS Marketplace figures

Sprinto lists $7,500 a year for up to 100 employees, plus $2,000 a year for the first framework, $9,500 combined. Vanta starts at $14,000 a year for 1 to 20 employees. The bands differ, so the figures are not like for like.

Which one to buy

Sprinto fits a team that writes its own tests and expects to add frameworks. It scores 84, the highest total of the seven, with custom tests and cross-framework mapping. Sprinto ranks 1st of seven, with 4.7 from 1,685 G2 reviews.

Vanta fits a team that needs FedRAMP or NIST 800-53 coverage, wants to check its stack against a list of 400 or more integrations, or wants the larger review count. Vanta ranks 2nd of seven at 82, with 4.6 from 2,734 G2 reviews.

Sprinto was founded in 2020 and says more than 4,000 companies use the platform. Vanta was founded in 2018 and says more than 16,000 companies use it.

Both score above Drata at 76. The ranked alternatives to Vanta lead with Sprinto, and the Vanta vs Drata comparison covers the other close pair.

Conclusion

Sprinto 84 and Vanta 82 are 2 points apart. Sprinto gains 2 points on customisation (5 against 4), and the two score the same on the other seven criteria.

For a team that writes its own tests across several frameworks, Sprinto fits better. For a team that needs FedRAMP or NIST 800-53, Vanta fits better.